The Insecurity Problem
I’ve talked to dozens of students who say: “I don’t have anything worth writing about.”
They’ve built:
- A to-do list app
- A weather dashboard
- A simple game
- A data visualization
- A Discord bot
But they don’t write about them because “everyone’s done that” or “it’s too basic.”
Here’s the truth: The project’s complexity doesn’t matter. What matters is how you talk about it.
A well-documented “simple” project beats an undocumented “complex” one every time.
Why Write About Small Projects?
1. Demonstrates Communication Skills
Writing clearly about technical work is a core skill. Most developers can code. Fewer can explain their code.
2. Shows Your Process
Recruiters want to see how you think, not just what you built. A simple project with clear reasoning is more impressive than a complex project with no explanation.
3. Builds Your Portfolio
You need content. Three well-documented small projects beat zero documented large projects.
4. Helps You Learn
Writing forces you to understand what you did and why. It’s a learning tool, not just a showcase.
5. SEO and Discoverability
When recruiters Google you, they find your work. When other students search for solutions, they find your posts. Both are valuable.
The Framework: Before/After
The simplest way to frame any project is: “Before this, X was a problem. After this, X is solved.”
Example: To-Do List App
Weak framing:
“I built a to-do list app with React.”
Strong framing:
“I was using paper notes and losing track of tasks. I built a web app to organize my tasks by priority and due date. Now I have a single place to manage everything, and I learned React in the process.”
See the difference? The second version:
- Explains the motivation (real problem)
- Describes the solution (specific features)
- Shows the outcome (solved problem + learned skill)
Project Documentation Template
Here’s a structure that works for any project, big or small:
1. Overview (2-3 sentences)
What is it? What does it do? Why did you build it?
| |
2. The Problem (1-2 paragraphs)
What problem were you solving? Be specific. Personal problems are valid problems.
| |
Why this works:
- Specific details (paper notes, text files)
- Real consequences (missed deadlines)
- Clear motivation (learn React + solve problem)
3. Tech Stack
List what you used and briefly why.
| |
Don’t just list technologies. Add one sentence explaining your choice.
4. Key Features
What can it do? Use bullet points for clarity.
| |
5. What I Learned
This is the most important section. What skills did you develop?
| |
Why this works:
- Specific skills, not vague claims
- Shows depth of learning
- Demonstrates you understand what you did
6. Challenges and Solutions
What went wrong? How did you fix it? This shows problem-solving.
| |
What I learned: Keep state minimal and derive values when possible. This reduces bugs and makes the code easier to reason about.
Challenge 2: Mobile Layout
Problem: The desktop layout broke on mobile. Buttons were too small, and the task list was hard to read.
Solution: I adopted a mobile-first approach, designing for small screens first, then adding complexity for larger screens.
| |
What I learned: Mobile-first design is easier than trying to make a desktop design responsive. Start small and add complexity.
Why this works:
- Concrete numbers (200+ tasks, 3 months)
- Real usage (daily use)
- External validation (others use it)
- Measurable impact (30 minutes saved)
8. Future Improvements
What would you add next? Shows you’re thinking ahead.
| |
9. Takeaways
End with 3-5 concrete lessons.
| |
Real Example: Reframing a “Simple” Project
Let’s take a basic project and show how to present it well.
Project: Weather Dashboard
Weak version:
“I made a weather app using a weather API. It shows the temperature and conditions.”
Strong version:
Weather Dashboard
A clean, fast weather dashboard that shows current conditions and a 5-day forecast for any city.
Live Demo: weather.yoursite.com
GitHub: github.com/you/weather-dashboard
The Problem
I was tired of opening weather.com and dealing with ads, slow loading, and cluttered interfaces. I wanted a fast, clean way to check the weather—especially when planning my bike commute to campus.
What Makes This Different
- Fast: Loads in under 1 second
- Clean: No ads, no clutter, just weather data
- Useful: Shows “feels like” temperature and wind speed (important for biking)
- Persistent: Remembers your last searched city
Tech Stack
- Frontend: Vanilla JavaScript (wanted to practice fundamentals without frameworks)
- API: OpenWeatherMap API
- Styling: CSS Grid and custom properties
- Deployment: GitHub Pages
What I Learned
API Integration:
- Making HTTP requests with
fetch() - Handling API errors and rate limits
- Parsing JSON responses
- Securing API keys (environment variables)
Async JavaScript:
- Promises and async/await
- Error handling with try/catch
- Loading states and user feedback
UI/UX:
- Skeleton screens while loading
- Error messages that help users
- Responsive design for mobile
- Accessibility (keyboard navigation, ARIA labels)
Challenges
Challenge: API Key Security
I initially hardcoded my API key in the JavaScript file. A classmate pointed out this was visible in the browser’s dev tools.
Solution: I moved the API key to a backend proxy (simple Netlify function) that makes the actual API call. The frontend calls my proxy, which adds the API key server-side.
What I learned: Never expose API keys in frontend code. Always use a backend proxy or environment variables.
Results
- ⚡ Loads 5x faster than weather.com
- 🚴 I check it every morning before biking to class
- 👥 10 friends bookmarked it and use it regularly
- 📱 Works perfectly on mobile
- ⭐ 15 GitHub stars from sharing on Reddit
Future Plans
- Add weather alerts
- Support for multiple saved cities
- Historical weather data
- Weather-based activity suggestions (“Good day for biking!”)
Takeaways
- Solve your own problems: I use this daily because it solves a real problem I had.
- Simple can be better: A focused tool that does one thing well beats a complex tool that does everything poorly.
- Security matters: Learning about API key security early saved me from a costly mistake.
- Share your work: Posting on Reddit led to great feedback and users.
See how much more compelling that is? Same project, better presentation.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
1. Apologizing for Simplicity
Don’t say:
- “This is just a simple project…”
- “I know this isn’t very impressive…”
- “Everyone’s done this before…”
Instead:
- Focus on what you learned
- Emphasize the problem you solved
- Show your unique approach or insights
2. Only Showing Code
Code without context is hard to evaluate. Always explain:
- Why you wrote it this way
- What problem it solves
- What alternatives you considered
3. Skipping the “Why”
Don’t just say what you built. Explain:
- Why you built it
- Why you chose these technologies
- Why you made specific decisions
4. No Visuals
Add screenshots, diagrams, or GIFs. Visual proof makes your project more tangible.
5. Ignoring Failures
Failures are learning opportunities. Share what didn’t work and what you learned from it.
Linking to GitHub
Your project post should link to your GitHub repo. Make sure your repo has:
Essential README Sections
| |
Usage
[How to use it]
Technologies
- Tech 1
- Tech 2
What I Learned
[Brief summary]
License
MIT
✅ Good:
- “Add task filtering by priority”
- “Fix mobile layout overflow issue”
- “Implement LocalStorage persistence”
❌ Bad:
- “Update”
- “Fix stuff”
- “Changes”